Talk: 10188 Death Star

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 10188 Death Star article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. The forum can be found here
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Brickipedia? Welcome!	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Article milestones Date Process Result July 22, 2010 Class 2 article June 20, 2011 Class 1 nomination Success
Current status: Class 1 article

There is actually no 4-LOM in the Death Star set. On the box and in the description at Lego Shop@Home it says the set contains a death star droid, which looks like a black C-3PO and not 4-LOM.

• 4-LOM 4-LOM on Wookieepedia

• Death Star set on Shop@Home

Description without 4-LOM: Includes 24 minifigures and droids, plus all-new Dianoga™ trash compactor monster! Includes 6 new and exclusive minifigures and droids only found in this set: Luke Skywalker™ (Stormtrooper™ outfit), Han Solo™ (Stormtrooper outfit), Assassin Droid™, Interrogation Droid, Death Star Droid and 2 Death Star Troopers™! Also includes Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Obi-Wan Kenobi™, C-3PO™, R2-D2™, Princess Leia™, Chewbacca™, Luke Skywalker (Jedi Knight), Darth Vader™, Grand Moff Tarkin™, Emperor Palpatine™, 2 Stormtroopers, 2 Emperor's Royal Guards™, R2-Q5™, and mouse droid!.

I think this should be corrected in both articles. I would have done it, but it might be deemed as vandalism. --Future74 20:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Just discovered in the description on the box that this set includes an Assassin Driod and not IG-88. --Future74 19:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

-Is anyone bothered by the fact that this article is way too detailed? It should be more concise. MillieMuddFan67 19:57, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

• I agree its way to tedious to read , and there's a Minifigure section and then there's the Minifigures Included section, If nothing else at least these two sections can be incorporated together. Gladiatoring 02:47, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Redlinks

In the section there is alot of red links. I don't know how to make articles on bricks, and whenever I get rid of them someone puts them back. And I have NO idea how to make an article on them because I don't own the set, therefore don't know what they are like. Darth Platypus 20:48, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

Don't worry, someone will be making them eventually. Heck, I might even make one today :P ajr 21:02, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

Don't do Part 59349. I've already started on it. --TheGrandEditor 21:03, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

I might get this set, because I entered a contest and if I win I'll get this set. And if I win, I'll do a page for each brick thats missing. I am usually lucky with contests, but I'm still crossing my fingers just in case. Darth Platypus 02:14, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

You wouldn't have to. We have our own parts list handy on Bricklink, so even if we don't have the set, we know what parts it has. --TheGrandEditor 02:20, November 27, 2010 (UTC)