FANDOM

 
33,486 Pages

This Forum has been archived

Visit the new Forums
Forums - Class 1 for impulse sets?
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page.

No reason for archiving given.



Is Class 2 (complete) the highest status that an impulse set can go? Do they have the 'potential' do become Class 1? If not…why? Feel free to post your thoughts below. Agent Charge 22:04, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


New Class

Proposal: If impulse sets aren't Class 1 'potential,' why don't we have a new class (like class 1) for articles that aren't 'class 1 potential?' It would be like a side-class for articles that aren't 'potential' for class 1 (Even though I don't think that articles can't be 'potential' enough). Agent Charge 22:12, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

  • I considered proposing this for parts, but decided we really had enough different classes. So, put me down as neutral. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  • (We already have that class, it's called complete.) Jag 22:37, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Would just give me something else to ignore, so whatever. ~ CJC 22:39, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose I don't see why they can't be class 1 articles. Maybe not featured, but class 1 seems perfectly fine to me. I mean, there is more to describe about an impulse set than a part, yet we have a couple part articles which are c1. --Berrybrick (Talk) 23:31, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
    • I totally agree with you, but Class 1 proposals have been unsuccessful because they don't have the 'potential' to be class 1. (I totally disagree that articles can't be 'potential' enough to be Class 1.) Agent Charge 08:38, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Different ratings for different types of sets? That would be gettting waaay too complex. The "Complete article" rating was designed for smaller articles which could not possible have as much information as a larger set, but was still fully described and filled out correctly. I do think however that "Class 2" makes an article sound incomplete and in need of improvement though... NightblazeSaber 23:38, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
    • How about we say that impulse sets and not-so-major minifigures can be class 1 then? Agent Charge 02:42, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Closed. No new class to be implemented. And there is no set rule to say that impulse sets absolutely can't be made c1, it is up to the opinions of the voters. NightblazeSaber 23:25, September 25, 2012 (UTC)