33,486 Pages

This Forum has been archived

Visit the new Forums
Forums - Civility Policy
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page.

Comment: Consensus is successful, but I'm not sure if this ever happened before the forum was archived.

In my eyes, today is a sad day. It's the day that someone believes we need a civility policy strongly enough so that they create a forum on it. The good days on this wiki are gone, but at least with this we will have the ability to remove those users who refuse to play nice with others. NightblazeSaber 00:06, April 9, 2011 (UTC)


Adopt a civility policy


  1. NightblazeSaber 00:06, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I fully agree. LEGO Lord Talk 13,498 Edits! ---- LEGO LOTR is coming!
  3. Skdhjf(Talk!) 01:02, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
  4. The fact that this is necessary leaves me aghast, but it's an unfortunate truth. FB100Ztalkcontribs 01:12, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
    • Oh, wait, I'm not allowed to vote since I have less than 200 mainspace edits, which makes me a person with no knowledge at all on how wikis should be managed, despite having two years of experience being an administrator. I forgot. I guess my vote doesn't count, does it? FB100Ztalkcontribs 01:18, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
  5. As long as it includes language.--Berrybrick talk -- "Berry Has Come To Warn You Sir." 13:04, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
    • The problem being, what the @$#&% is the definition of "language?" FB100Ztalkcontribs 04:41, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
      • Bad language. Basically everything here. Do not follow if you don't want to see bad language'''Berrybrick talk -- "Berry Has Come To Warn You Sir." 23:21, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
        • we're relying on that list as the absolute definitive truth? Oh, and saying "holy ****" is quite different from being rude or uncivilized. FB100Ztalkcontribs 00:13, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
  6. SKP4472 Talk 13,998 Edits! Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 13:07, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
  7. I'd rather call this a "Civility Guideline".  Samdo994 talk contribs  10:20, April 19, 2011 (UTC)


  1. I'm not so sure that we need a civility policy. Someone can be just as rude (or worse) while being completely civil. It happens all the time in business. BobaFett Talk Adventure logo MOCPages Group (Click) 19:00, April 15, 2011 (UTC)


Can't we make this a guideline instead? FB100Ztalkcontribs 01:11, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Eh, never mind. FB100Ztalkcontribs 01:11, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Use Wikipedia's civility policy


  1. NightblazeSaber 00:06, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Looks good, but I guess we should shorten or rewrite it.  Samdo994 talk contribs  10:20, April 19, 2011 (UTC)




                  • I think it wasn't wise to put that. Someone could get seriously offended.:P Skdhjf(Talk!) 22:18, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • If we are to make one, the best thing to do would be to use wikipedias as an influence, and not try and forge our own as that will be undoubtedly biased. - cjc 13:17, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • When does voting end? Berrybrick talk -- "Berry Has Come To Warn You Sir." 11:48, April 24, 2011 (UTC)


  • So, what are we going to put in the policy? NightblazeSaber 00:04, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Below are a few points....
  1. Don't call other users questionable words (freaking anon, dork, stupid, etc.) on edit summaries....
  2. Debates on forums, talk pages, etc. that turn into arguments are not permitted.

....and more..... Skdhjf(Talk!) 00:36, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

    • If we don't allow arguments, that could restrict our template use. (See what I did there?) FB100Ztalkcontribs 06:11, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support! Support! Support! -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  • No arguing? --Berrybrick (Talk) 13:20, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • I learnt this in logic... arguing is okay. Arguing simply means that you are disagreeing with someone, and that you are using reasons to back up your case (basically another word for a debate). A fight is when people start insulting each other, etc. That should not be allowed. Jag 19:06, April 8, 2012 (UTC)