This page lists good articles that have several shortcomings and need to be revised.
I don't know. Did I really vote for this? This article looks like an incohesive collection of text snippets. All I see are bullet points. (well this may actually conform to the GA criteria, but almost every article could pass the "Have at least one well-written original paragraph describing what the article is about" criterion, which basically describes what a good lead section should actually be.) Maybe someone with more expertise on the subject can rewrite the article in the style of Power Miners. --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 08:27, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this could do with a bit of a cleanup. Having the bullet points from the "Characters" section and the lead section in "Minifigures" is my main concern, but I don't really know too much about Atlantis either and don't want to ruin it NightblazeSaber 04:42, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
- The "Castles that use the same baseplate" bit under "See also" could be called either incomplete, or having one set listed which doesn't have this part- it depends on whether we're listing the element or design id (see Part 2552 on Peeron- set 6082 is listed as having part 2552px5, whilst set 8086 has part 2552px6). I'm not sure whether sets with the same design or element id should be listed, so I didn't change any of it. NightblazeSaber 23:08, March 13, 2010 (UTC)