| Overview
Articles for Scrap is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger. Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}}, and do not need to be discussed here. If you are unsure whether a page should be speedy deleted or not, then nominate it for deletion here and an Administrator will see if it is worth of speedy deletion. |
| Instructions for use
To leave a nomination, click here and replace |
Nominations
LEGO WORLD
Is this official? ~ CJC 16:32, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
LEGO World Netherlands --EyeExist (talk) 17:29, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
What do you mean with: "Is this official?" You suggest this event is not approved by LEGO? This is the largest LEGO event in the world, with official LEGO stands, for more than 10 years now. Please be aware LEGO Club is present, all major LEGO fan clubs, the LEGO Service representatives and even the builders from LEGO Denmark are behind the counter. I think you can still visit it for the coming days if you want to. Also please take a look at the website. --MeJo (talk) 22:08, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
- What I think CJC means is "Is this event organized by the LEGO Group?". -Cligra Join the redlink war!
- ^ - if it is not official LEGO event, it doesn't matter how many people are there, it is still unofficial. ~ CJC 16:18, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Keep,I heard about it on the newspaper. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.
- ...So every time something - such as a custom - is mentioned in the press, we should have an article? I think the Metro or The Sun mentioned the LEGO Felix skyjumper thing, so should we have one for that? ~ CJC 16:18, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete if it's an unofficial event. Or, move to the custom namespace and have a section for fan events. The mainspace should be dealing with official content only, not stuff like this. For this reason, I'm also not sure why we have James May... NightblazeSaber 22:39, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- James May things can just go in the references in culture page. ~ CJC 08:08, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
So I should get in contact with LEGO Group, to ask whether they consider this event as 'an official LEGO event'? If so, the page stays as is, if not, the page moves to a special page for LEGO events? --MeJo (talk) 13:17, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
How about LEGO World Denmark Contacts They all have lego.com addresses in their mail. Looks pretty official to me. Also in 2013 there will be 14 tons of LEGO and more than 250 models. Must come from LEGO.--EyeExist (talk) 21:03, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
I think it is official, I believe it was on LEGO.com aswell. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.
Part 76382
Should be deleted per Brickipedia:Forum/An even newer parts numbering system, or at the very least be turned into a page for blank torsos with the same coloured arms and hands.
Discussion
- Delete, as nominator. --Berrybrick (Talk) 11:32, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, per my "master page" idea on the forum.
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:54, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion, oppose putting every single variant on one page. ~ CJC 20:21, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, all the Torsos have the same Design ID, that is what all the Legs, Heads, Helmets, and everything else is.
RaceLord talk, Lord of Nothing
- i know we all have different ideas, but i think we should go with Jeyo's Idea a bit, but have the Inventory pages go to Part 76382, then they link to there different torso page, idk how it will work RaceLord talk, Lord of Nothing
- i know we all have different ideas, but i think we should go with Jeyo's Idea a bit, but have the Inventory pages go to Part 76382, then they link to there different torso page, idk how it will work
- Keep but only put plain torsos, plain arms and plain hands on it Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :P
- I don't know parts is getting waaay to confusing again... NightblazeSaber 05:44, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It looks like it took a long time to make, but still, don't all these parts have their own page? (And it's missing hundreds of parts!)
BrikkyyTalk Extras! 06:24, Junuary 20, 2013 (UTC)
Flick-Fire Missiles
(deletion suggested on talk page)
- Neutral, leaning towards keep. I don't see how it'd hurt, it's widely used, and a weapon of more than one piece (we have lightsaber and a lot of Chima weapon pages). NightblazeSaber 03:11, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. They have, perhaps not so fortunately, become an important aspect of LEGO's general design process. :P -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
- Delete No need for such a page - if we are going to do this, we may as well list every other feature LEGO has ever made. - Czech
- Per NBS. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:01, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not needed. --Toa Matau Le-Metru 23:35, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Changing my vote to 'keep, per my reason above. NightblazeSaber 23:49, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I created the page for a reason :)
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:49, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete It really is not needed, other wise we might as well make a catapults or cockpits page.- Jedi master sith Spider Talk Ultimate Spider-Man! 55:40, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
- But flickfires (as much as I hate them) have become part of LEGO's individuality. All of LEGO's rip-offs have cockpits and catapults.
- 1. They are in a lot of sets because they are one of the better play features (at least function-wise anyways) 2. This is a LEGO wiki. I was making a example.- Jedi master sith Spider Talk Ultimate Spider-Man!
- Keep just needs work RaceLord talk, Lord of Nothing
Some LOTR stuff
Okay. This is getting ridiculous. Can we just have articles on the playable characters in the game? I don't know who those are, so somebody else will have to mark them, but really? Is that notable at all? --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:52, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
- Support. This was the reason I made a lot of that work on the LotR pages. The pages that ought to be deleted include
Hobbit, Cirdan, Aldor, Great Beast, and Moth. These are all cutscene only, sans Hobbit. Jay
- Thanks, but if the Hobbit can be interacted with in some way, then we should keep it. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:28, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, he can. (same reason that Possessed Theoden is still on the page, he's a boss character.) But that should mean pages for "Man", "Elf", and "Dwarf". Jay
- Deleted all but "Hobbit" (should it be moved to Unidentified Hobbit?) as per the deleting cutscene only characters policy NightblazeSaber 00:41, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
- I think "hobbit (LotR the videogame)" would be appropriate, because he is "identified." Jay
- As who exactly? NightblazeSaber 22:51, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
- As a hobbit, in need of a trowel (or soup pot, or stop wand, or sun hat, etc...) Jay
- Well that's not his name :S NightblazeSaber 00:06, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Just leave him at hobbit. Jay
- Well that's not his name :S NightblazeSaber 00:06, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
- As a hobbit, in need of a trowel (or soup pot, or stop wand, or sun hat, etc...) Jay
- As who exactly? NightblazeSaber 22:51, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
- I think "hobbit (LotR the videogame)" would be appropriate, because he is "identified." Jay
- @Berrybrick, I don't know if you can say he can be interacted with, he's just an invincible computer character on a pig who doesn't really do much. NightblazeSaber 22:51, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Who is this? Jay
- Actually, I don't have a clue what this page is even meant to be on now- I thought it was the guy riding around on the pig (as seen in the gallery), yet the infobox image is of a completely different person NightblazeSaber 00:06, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Who is this? Jay
"Lego Hims"
This only appeared for about less than a minute in a movie. I don't see why it should be left up, but I decided not to add speedy delete because it is a legitimate subject, no matter how non-important. Jay
Spiderlily - lego city
Why it should be deleted. User request, unused
Discussion
- Delete, as nominator.