| Forums: Index → |
|
→ Articles for Deletion |
This forum is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed. To leave a nomination, please add a new section with with the name of the article in question as the title. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page.
Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.
- Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}} and do not need to be discussed here.
Poggle the Lesser
Delete
- This character apparently appeared briefly in one movie clip in a LEGO Star Wars game. I can't say I even recall seeing him (although I don't own every version of the game). I just don't know if we should have every single unplayable character from a video game that only appears for a few frames. Weak delete. NightblazeSaber 08:05, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
- If he isn't a main character that only appears in the game, it would be better to delete it. GG 360
11:57, November 5, 2009 (UTC) - He only appeared for a brief moment. Plus, he isn't a minifigure. Construction Worker: Made for Fun! 12:28, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Delete if the character appears as Nighthawk said, then it should be alteast moved to Lego Star Wars wiki or something like that, its not really needed here. --
Lcawte 12:30, December 24, 2009 (UTC) - Never saw him in the game. 9legoboy9 (talk • contr) 13:45, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
- agreed, now, 3 months later, can we delete it.Kingcjc 22:27, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Keep
- He's Part of The Game, The Storyline, Most of All...He's A Minifigure!! KEEP!!!! Crotocall 04:22, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
- Poggle the Lesser is a minigigure and one of the goals of Brickipedia is to have a vast databse on all minifigures. Regardless of how long he appeared, he is still a part of the game, and if he is still part of the game, he is still worth mentioning. --Darthch 12:00, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- Part of the game so you just have to keep.--Legoguy1866 Go Eagles!
12:12, December 24, 2009 (UTC) - All minifigures should definetely be kept --Clone Commander Fox 23:04, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
- What Darthch saidBrickmacktalkcontribs
- --Coupon11 16:43, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Perhaps we could merge this with Geonosian or something. -Nerfblasterpro: It's Nerf, or Nothing!
18:38, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
- He isn't a minifigure! He only appeared for a brief second, if that, in a LEGO Star Wars game. I don't even think he appeared in that. I just played through all Episode 2 and 3 levels yesterday, and I never once saw him. Construction Worker Do you need help? 20:31, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Ark of the Covenant
Delete
- Though it's important to the storyline, it's just another feature for the set. I don't think it really deserves its own page. --Alphateam7911 21:27, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I dont see the point of having all these extra pages about parts of the sets. This should go on the page of whatever set it is included inBrickmacktalkcontribs
Keep
- That is part of a set and a major part of the story. Why delete it? CloneComander Cody
11:39 January 3, 2010 (UTC) - --Coupon11 16:44, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
- At any rate, this page needs an "Appearances" section if it's even going to be considered for keeping. NightblazeSaber 22:46, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
1754 Space Jet
Delete
Keep
Comments
As transferred from the talk page - "This is not in the Colector's book, what is it?--Coupon11 22:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Im very sceptical of this set existing. All their is is lugnets page. it is just questions marks and the comment says that its probably a typo of set 1954. Kingcjc 21:59, January 2, 2010 (UTC)" Kingcjc 21:43, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Hamburger stand
Delete
- I think we only need vehicles in games (like the LEGO Star Wars series). The rest should just be expanded upon in the set article. Do we have some sort of policy on this? Kingcjc 21:53, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Not needed.--Coupon11 16:45, January 9, 2010 (UTC)